Skip to main content

Air Pollution Hangs Over Sydney

A blanket of smoke covered Sydney earlier this week, raising some complex questions about how we balance public health and safety when it comes to air pollution.

Hazardous air quality levels were recorded across Sydney on Tuesday, with more than 60 people reported to require treatment for acute respiratory issues.  There was some exaggerated reporting about air pollution in Sydney being worse than Beijing - which is actually not shocking given that it is summer in the northern hemisphere and a same-day comparison is almost meaningless - but nevertheless, the recorded air quality index (AQI) values in excess of 200 (even above 400 in some locations) were dangerous, especially to vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and those with known respiratory issues.

The culprit in this latest pollution event was planned and controlled fuel reduction burns, which themselves are an unavoidable part of living safely alongside the Australian bush.  Unfortunately, the best conditions for controlled burns - cold, still days - can result in the greatest air pollution threats, with smoldering fires and trapped smoke plumes.  It will be difficult to decide just how much importance we should place on air pollution risks when managing bush fires, but severe impacts on the air that millions of people breathe must be taken into consideration.  We do have the capacity to model the extent of air pollution from controlled burns beforehand, based on meteorological predictions, and this needs to be incorporated into planned burns if it isn't already, with the results used to inform when to carry out burns and to alert the public of their potential severity.  There are also worrying reports that logging burns in Victorian forests are being described as fuel reduction efforts, and it is difficult to see these as being in the public interest.

A broader issue here is that the bush fire season in Australia has been moving earlier and earlier in the year, and it will continue to do so on our warming planet.  The need to co-exist with fires and air pollution is here to stay, and we need to think seriously about how to best manage this.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Australia's Clean Air Myth

I've been thinking a lot about air quality in Australia recently as I wrote up my submission in response to Victoria's Air Quality Statement, which will help shape a future air quality strategy for this state.  The Clean Air Statement presents a rosy picture for air quality in Victoria - our air is repeatedly described as "great" and "very good" - and this leaves the impression that air pollution is not a current health danger to Victorians.  Anecdotally, I have seen this attitude adopted by Australians around the country, who ask me why I need to research air quality in Australia and tell me that we already breathe clean air.  It is true that our air is cleaner than many of our neighbours, but this doesn't mean that it is healthy.  Air pollution in China, for instance, is one of the biggest handbrakes on development in what may soon be the world's biggest economy, and it is meaningless to compare it to Australia.

So, how big is Australia's air …

Is Someone Cheating on the Montreal Protocol?

The Montreal Protocol regulates emissions of ozone depleting substances.  It is ratified by every nation and bans the use of chemicals including chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), long lived substances which break down the stratosphere's protective ozone layer.  The international treaty has led to decreasing atmospheric levels of CFCs, and the ozone layer is beginning to recover.  It is now being reported, however, that atmospheric levels of one CFC (trichlorofluoromethane, CFC-11) have slowed their rate of decrease, attributed to a new CFC-11 source from Asia.

The origin of these new CFC-11 emissions are unclear, and will be difficult to pinpoint.  They may be from clandestine use of the banned substance, but could also arise from leaky CFC-11 stockpiles.  An international effort to investigate this issue now appears warranted, since it threatens to undo much of the good work of the Montreal Protocol.

CFCs are not the only threat to the ozone layer.  Recent studies have shown that the o…

New Zealand's Toxic Methyl Bromide Problem

Concerns are mounting in New Zealand around the continued use of methyl bromide for fumigation.  Methyl bromide is a highly effective fumigant, but it is also depletes the ozone layer and is harmful to human health.  Under the Montreal Protocol for the regulation of ozone depleting substances, use of methyl bromide is banned for all but a few exempt quarantine purposes. This ban has seen measured atmospheric levels of this substance drop from about 10 to 8 parts per trillion. In New Zealand, however, methyl bromide usage is soaring, with a 2020 deadline to eliminate methyl bromide emissions looming.

One of the biggest exemptions for methyl bromide use is in fumigating logs for export. China and India are the main destinations and both prefer methyl bromide treatment as a bio-security measure. New Zealand is a significant exporter of logs to China and India, and in recent years has grown to become one of the biggest users of methyl bromide worldwide. The NZ government have a 2020 deadl…